How to work through it

01

Compare four production strategies

A direct continuation preserves more of the source but concentrates risk at the join. Full regeneration can redesign the whole shot but may lose an already approved performance. An editorial concealment uses a cutaway, transition, freeze, speed change, or reaction shot to avoid generating a continuous join. A hybrid method extends only enough to reach a safer cut point, then completes the beat through editing. Treat these as workflow patterns, not claims that every named product exposes every operation. Confirm available controls, input support, and account terms before assigning a method.

02

Score the constraints that matter

Rate each strategy against identity continuity, action precision, camera-path preservation, source rights, required duration, acceptable artifacts, edit flexibility, operator time, render budget, review burden, and deadline. Weight the criteria from the brief rather than defaulting to the most technically novel option. A dialogue close-up may prioritize facial continuity and lip timing; an atmospheric establishing shot may tolerate a hidden transition; a locked product action may require full regeneration from a longer plan. Attach evidence for cost and availability instead of borrowing numbers from social discussion.

03

Select a primary and fallback method

Write a decision statement naming the chosen method, the evidence supporting it, the unresolved product questions, the stop conditions, and the fallback. Define when a failed join triggers trimming, when repeated identity drift triggers regeneration, and when the schedule requires an editorial cover. Test the cheapest discriminating step before committing the full sequence. Preserve both the source and trial outputs so the decision remains reversible. The selected method is valid for this shot and brief; it does not establish general capability, quality, limits, access, or commercial performance.