Define the orientation job before choosing a product

Treat “ai nano” as a broad orientation request, not as evidence that a feature exists. The action implied by the query is to clarify the term and choose the next production decision; the working object is editorial topic. Write the intended audience or user, authorized input, desired change, review owner, and finished handoff. Also state what the task excludes. This brief keeps search wording from turning into an unsupported promise about SEELE, a named vendor, a model, or an automatic result. While evidence is current, preserve the reference set, and ask the model evaluator to record claim scope before the acceptance review.

• Input: a clear definition of the term, the reader's production context, authorized examples, and an explicit question to resolve While evidence is current, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the rights reviewer to record source fidelity before the acceptance review.
• Success: a bounded explanation or plan that identifies the next decision without inventing product access, controls, evidence, or outcomes While evidence is current, preserve the evidence table, and ask the creative lead to record disclosure clarity before the workflow transfer.
• Stop condition: missing rights, consent, safety review, primary evidence, or delivery authority While evidence is current, preserve the rights memo, and ask the model evaluator to record camera logic before the workflow transfer.

Use the category discovery method

Start by defining the term or named product in neutral language, then separate the reader's likely production job from brand recognition, spelling variants, and search popularity. Build a shortlist of questions before opening any workspace or vendor page. For this query, clarify the intended meaning and production job before choosing a process or product. Keep notes about assumptions, source dates, failed checks, and human decisions beside the working asset. The category-discovery classification determines this learning sequence, while the authoritative taxonomy remains the only owner of the route. This page supplies editorial copy and cannot silently change the category, subhub, or URL. While evidence is current, preserve the decision history, and ask the identity reviewer to record source fidelity before the workflow transfer.

Apply the topic orientation boundary

Treat ambiguous or weakly related search language as a question to clarify. Do not turn it into a SEELE capability, endorsement, factual claim, or interactive workflow without evidence. Work from a clear definition of the term, the reader's production context, authorized examples, and an explicit question to resolve. Review toward a bounded explanation or plan that identifies the next decision without inventing product access, controls, evidence, or outcomes. A polished draft is not enough: the reviewer must be able to see which source supports each factual statement, who authorized each asset or identity, and which product behavior is still an unanswered test question. Topic selection alone never establishes safety, availability, quality, or permission. Before moving on, preserve the review copy, and ask the model evaluator to record human approval before the editorial approval.

• Clarify the intended meaning Before moving on, preserve the test fixture, and ask the creative lead to record source fidelity before the production checkpoint.
• Choose an authorized example Before moving on, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the source custodian to record human approval before the production checkpoint.
• Name the evidence needed for the next decision Before moving on, preserve the continuity note, and ask the production lead to record reversal cost before the production checkpoint.

Record evidence, review the handoff, and name the next check

The handoff should state what the reader now understands, which interpretation remains uncertain, and which official source would be needed before a product-specific conclusion is publishable. Run separate passes for craft, factual accuracy, identity and source rights, safety, accessibility, and destination requirements. Record the source and verification date for any changing platform, model, price, policy, privacy, export, or compatibility statement. If primary evidence is missing, publish the item only as a question or editorial planning step. The finished handoff must name the approver and preserve a path back to the authorized original. While evidence is current, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the production lead to record input provenance before the scope confirmation.