Define the planning job before choosing a product

Treat “ai video maker from script” as a production-planning request, not as evidence that a feature exists. The action implied by the query is to clarify the term and choose the next production decision; the working object is script. Write the intended audience or user, authorized input, desired change, review owner, and finished handoff. Also state what the task excludes. This brief keeps search wording from turning into an unsupported promise about SEELE, a named vendor, a model, or an automatic result. At the next gate, preserve the source ledger, and ask the factual editor to record control availability before the evidence refresh.

• Input: an audience brief, supportable message, authorized references, beat list, visual constraints, and delivery target At the next gate, preserve the brief version, and ask the workflow owner to record evidence freshness before the evidence refresh.
• Success: a traceable script or board in which each beat has a purpose, source, shot intention, continuity note, and review owner At the next gate, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the brand reviewer to record visible continuity before the rights check.
• Stop condition: missing rights, consent, safety review, primary evidence, or delivery authority At the next gate, preserve the control log, and ask the factual editor to record revision intent before the rights check.

Use the planning and scripting method

Begin with audience, purpose, source material, key message, sequence, and delivery condition. Draft the smallest useful outline, map each beat to evidence or an authorized asset, then revise structure before polishing language or imagining generated footage. For this query, turn the idea into a brief, ordered beats, review ownership, and a delivery contract. Keep notes about assumptions, source dates, failed checks, and human decisions beside the working asset. The planning-scripting classification determines this learning sequence, while the authoritative taxonomy remains the only owner of the route. This page supplies editorial copy and cannot silently change the category, subhub, or URL. At the next gate, preserve the authorization record, and ask the channel editor to record evidence freshness before the rights check.

Apply the script and storyboard planning boundary

Templates and generated suggestions are proposals, not factual evidence or finished footage. Do not fabricate quotes, customer experience, product behavior, or rights to reference imagery. Work from an audience brief, supportable message, authorized references, beat list, visual constraints, and delivery target. Review toward a traceable script or board in which each beat has a purpose, source, shot intention, continuity note, and review owner. A polished draft is not enough: the reviewer must be able to see which source supports each factual statement, who authorized each asset or identity, and which product behavior is still an unanswered test question. Topic selection alone never establishes safety, availability, quality, or permission. For a controlled test, preserve the reference set, and ask the channel editor to record evidence freshness before the production checkpoint.

• Map every beat to purpose and evidence For a controlled test, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the claims reviewer to record destination fit before the production checkpoint.
• Preserve source and identity rights For a controlled test, preserve the brief version, and ask the channel editor to record revision intent before the editorial approval.
• Review continuity before visual polish For a controlled test, preserve the source ledger, and ask the claims reviewer to record visible continuity before the editorial approval.

Record evidence, review the handoff, and name the next check

The handoff should let a reviewer trace every beat to its source, see what remains a creative proposal, and identify which script, board, transcript, or description decision needs approval next. Run separate passes for craft, factual accuracy, identity and source rights, safety, accessibility, and destination requirements. Record the source and verification date for any changing platform, model, price, policy, privacy, export, or compatibility statement. If primary evidence is missing, publish the item only as a question or editorial planning step. The finished handoff must name the approver and preserve a path back to the authorized original. In the decision log, preserve the test fixture, and ask the factual editor to record revision intent before the rights check.