Define the verification job before choosing a product

Treat “are grok imagine videos private” as a yes-or-no verification request, not as evidence that a feature exists. The action implied by the query is to resolve a factual or conceptual question; the working object is named model or platform. Write the intended audience or user, authorized input, desired change, review owner, and finished handoff. Also state what the task excludes. This brief keeps search wording from turning into an unsupported promise about SEELE, a named vendor, a model, or an automatic result. Before delivery, preserve the rights memo, and ask the release approver to record destination fit before the controlled revision.

• Input: non-sensitive test media, the current privacy terms, retention details, sharing defaults, and an authorized data owner Before delivery, preserve the evidence table, and ask the brand reviewer to record evidence freshness before the controlled revision.
• Success: a documented decision about whether the service and workflow meet the project's privacy, retention, visibility, and deletion requirements Before delivery, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the channel editor to record visible continuity before the delivery pass.
• Stop condition: missing rights, consent, safety review, primary evidence, or delivery authority Before delivery, preserve the reference set, and ask the release approver to record input provenance before the delivery pass.

Use the dated model guide method

Record the exact provider and version named by the query, the access surface being evaluated, the verification date, and the production job. Turn inputs, controls, limits, pricing, privacy, and output behavior into evidence questions until primary sources are attached. For this query, identify the claim, the authoritative source, the date, and the conditions that could change the answer. Keep notes about assumptions, source dates, failed checks, and human decisions beside the working asset. The model-guides classification determines this learning sequence, while the authoritative taxonomy remains the only owner of the route. This page supplies editorial copy and cannot silently change the category, subhub, or URL. Before delivery, preserve the test fixture, and ask the factual editor to record identity consent before the controlled revision.

Apply the privacy and data governance boundary

Do not infer that uploads or generations are private, public, retained, deleted, or training-exempt. Verify each condition in current first-party terms and account controls. Work from non-sensitive test media, the current privacy terms, retention details, sharing defaults, and an authorized data owner. Review toward a documented decision about whether the service and workflow meet the project's privacy, retention, visibility, and deletion requirements. A polished draft is not enough: the reviewer must be able to see which source supports each factual statement, who authorized each asset or identity, and which product behavior is still an unanswered test question. Topic selection alone never establishes safety, availability, quality, or permission. In the decision log, preserve the control log, and ask the brand reviewer to record human approval before the bounded test.

• Use non-sensitive evaluation media In the decision log, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the release approver to record failure conditions before the bounded test.
• Verify visibility and retention In the decision log, preserve the evidence table, and ask the workflow owner to record claim scope before the editorial approval.
• Record the responsible data owner In the decision log, preserve the rights memo, and ask the factual editor to record source fidelity before the editorial approval.

Record evidence, review the handoff, and name the next check

The record must distinguish documented facts, direct observations, and open questions. A similar name, search result, or third-party demonstration is not enough to establish current availability in SEELE or elsewhere. Run separate passes for craft, factual accuracy, identity and source rights, safety, accessibility, and destination requirements. Record the source and verification date for any changing platform, model, price, policy, privacy, export, or compatibility statement. If primary evidence is missing, publish the item only as a question or editorial planning step. The finished handoff must name the approver and preserve a path back to the authorized original. For a controlled test, preserve the authorization record, and ask the model evaluator to record control availability before the workflow transfer.