Define the verification job before choosing a product

Treat “are grok imagine videos public” as a yes-or-no verification request, not as evidence that a feature exists. The action implied by the query is to resolve a factual or conceptual question; the working object is named model or platform. Write the intended audience or user, authorized input, desired change, review owner, and finished handoff. Also state what the task excludes. This brief keeps search wording from turning into an unsupported promise about SEELE, a named vendor, a model, or an automatic result. Before revision, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record camera logic before the final sign-off.

• Input: non-sensitive test media, the current privacy terms, retention details, sharing defaults, and an authorized data owner Before revision, preserve the decision history, and ask the production lead to record input provenance before the final sign-off.
• Success: a documented decision about whether the service and workflow meet the project's privacy, retention, visibility, and deletion requirements Before revision, preserve the test fixture, and ask the source custodian to record visible continuity before the final sign-off.
• Stop condition: missing rights, consent, safety review, primary evidence, or delivery authority Before revision, preserve the review copy, and ask the continuity editor to record claim scope before the final sign-off.

Use the dated model guide method

Record the exact provider and version named by the query, the access surface being evaluated, the verification date, and the production job. Turn inputs, controls, limits, pricing, privacy, and output behavior into evidence questions until primary sources are attached. For this query, identify the claim, the authoritative source, the date, and the conditions that could change the answer. Keep notes about assumptions, source dates, failed checks, and human decisions beside the working asset. The model-guides classification determines this learning sequence, while the authoritative taxonomy remains the only owner of the route. This page supplies editorial copy and cannot silently change the category, subhub, or URL. At this stage, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the workflow owner to record input provenance before the reversible handoff.

Apply the privacy and data governance boundary

Do not infer that uploads or generations are private, public, retained, deleted, or training-exempt. Verify each condition in current first-party terms and account controls. Work from non-sensitive test media, the current privacy terms, retention details, sharing defaults, and an authorized data owner. Review toward a documented decision about whether the service and workflow meet the project's privacy, retention, visibility, and deletion requirements. A polished draft is not enough: the reviewer must be able to see which source supports each factual statement, who authorized each asset or identity, and which product behavior is still an unanswered test question. Topic selection alone never establishes safety, availability, quality, or permission. At the next gate, preserve the decision history, and ask the workflow owner to record source fidelity before the rights check.

• Use non-sensitive evaluation media At the next gate, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the delivery owner to record identity consent before the rights check.
• Verify visibility and retention At the next gate, preserve the failure note, and ask the factual editor to record control availability before the rights check.
• Record the responsible data owner At the next gate, preserve the authorization record, and ask the policy reviewer to record evidence freshness before the rights check.

Record evidence, review the handoff, and name the next check

The record must distinguish documented facts, direct observations, and open questions. A similar name, search result, or third-party demonstration is not enough to establish current availability in SEELE or elsewhere. Run separate passes for craft, factual accuracy, identity and source rights, safety, accessibility, and destination requirements. Record the source and verification date for any changing platform, model, price, policy, privacy, export, or compatibility statement. If primary evidence is missing, publish the item only as a question or editorial planning step. The finished handoff must name the approver and preserve a path back to the authorized original. Before moving on, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the workflow owner to record destination fit before the workflow transfer.