Define the verification job before choosing a product

Treat “can claude generate images” as a yes-or-no verification request, not as evidence that a feature exists. The action implied by the query is to create a planned asset or draft; the working object is editorial topic. Write the intended audience or user, authorized input, desired change, review owner, and finished handoff. Also state what the task excludes. This brief keeps search wording from turning into an unsupported promise about SEELE, a named vendor, a model, or an automatic result. While evidence is current, preserve the review copy, and ask the policy reviewer to record identity consent before the dated decision.

• Input: the exact product, provider, version, region, account surface, production job, and verification date While evidence is current, preserve the test fixture, and ask the identity reviewer to record input provenance before the dated decision.
• Success: a dated evidence ledger covering identity, access, documented inputs, observable controls, outputs, limitations, and unresolved gaps While evidence is current, preserve the decision history, and ask the claims reviewer to record revision intent before the dated decision.
• Stop condition: missing rights, consent, safety review, primary evidence, or delivery authority While evidence is current, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the channel editor to record temporal order before the dated decision.

Use the how-to method method

Translate the request into an input, a reversible action, a checkpoint, and a finished handoff. Practice on a duplicate or non-sensitive sample, preserve the original, and stop when authorization, account access, safety, or factual uncertainty appears. For this query, identify the claim, the authoritative source, the date, and the conditions that could change the answer. Keep notes about assumptions, source dates, failed checks, and human decisions beside the working asset. The how-to-guides classification determines this learning sequence, while the authoritative taxonomy remains the only owner of the route. This page supplies editorial copy and cannot silently change the category, subhub, or URL. While evidence is current, preserve the evidence table, and ask the policy reviewer to record format readiness before the dated decision.

Apply the named platform or model facts boundary

Do not infer SEELE support, model access, quality, legitimacy, censorship, ownership, API behavior, or compatibility from the query. Verify first-party documentation and direct observations on the use date. Work from the exact product, provider, version, region, account surface, production job, and verification date. Review toward a dated evidence ledger covering identity, access, documented inputs, observable controls, outputs, limitations, and unresolved gaps. A polished draft is not enough: the reviewer must be able to see which source supports each factual statement, who authorized each asset or identity, and which product behavior is still an unanswered test question. Topic selection alone never establishes safety, availability, quality, or permission. During review, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the rights reviewer to record input provenance before the scope confirmation.

• Confirm exact provider and version During review, preserve the decision history, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record identity consent before the scope confirmation.
• Date every changing fact During review, preserve the authorization record, and ask the brand reviewer to record format readiness before the scope confirmation.
• Keep observations separate from documentation During review, preserve the failure note, and ask the production lead to record evidence freshness before the scope confirmation.

Record evidence, review the handoff, and name the next check

The result should be reproducible from the written decisions while leaving product-specific buttons, limits, and account behavior to current official documentation rather than invented steps. Run separate passes for craft, factual accuracy, identity and source rights, safety, accessibility, and destination requirements. Record the source and verification date for any changing platform, model, price, policy, privacy, export, or compatibility statement. If primary evidence is missing, publish the item only as a question or editorial planning step. The finished handoff must name the approver and preserve a path back to the authorized original. Before approval, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the source custodian to record temporal order before the bounded test.