Define the verification job before choosing a product

Treat “can i use sora 2 on mac” as a yes-or-no verification request, not as evidence that a feature exists. The action implied by the query is to evaluate access and an appropriate workflow; the working object is named model or platform. Write the intended audience or user, authorized input, desired change, review owner, and finished handoff. Also state what the task excludes. This brief keeps search wording from turning into an unsupported promise about SEELE, a named vendor, a model, or an automatic result. For the working record, preserve the test fixture, and ask the workflow owner to record evidence freshness before the reversible handoff.

• Input: the exact product, provider, version, region, account surface, production job, and verification date For the working record, preserve the review copy, and ask the factual editor to record control availability before the reversible handoff.
• Success: a dated evidence ledger covering identity, access, documented inputs, observable controls, outputs, limitations, and unresolved gaps For the working record, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the continuity editor to record human approval before the reversible handoff.
• Stop condition: missing rights, consent, safety review, primary evidence, or delivery authority For the working record, preserve the decision history, and ask the delivery owner to record format readiness before the reversible handoff.

Use the dated model guide method

Record the exact provider and version named by the query, the access surface being evaluated, the verification date, and the production job. Turn inputs, controls, limits, pricing, privacy, and output behavior into evidence questions until primary sources are attached. For this query, identify the claim, the authoritative source, the date, and the conditions that could change the answer. Keep notes about assumptions, source dates, failed checks, and human decisions beside the working asset. The model-guides classification determines this learning sequence, while the authoritative taxonomy remains the only owner of the route. This page supplies editorial copy and cannot silently change the category, subhub, or URL. For the working record, preserve the rights memo, and ask the brand reviewer to record visible continuity before the dated decision.

Apply the named platform or model facts boundary

Do not infer SEELE support, model access, quality, legitimacy, censorship, ownership, API behavior, or compatibility from the query. Verify first-party documentation and direct observations on the use date. Work from the exact product, provider, version, region, account surface, production job, and verification date. Review toward a dated evidence ledger covering identity, access, documented inputs, observable controls, outputs, limitations, and unresolved gaps. A polished draft is not enough: the reviewer must be able to see which source supports each factual statement, who authorized each asset or identity, and which product behavior is still an unanswered test question. Topic selection alone never establishes safety, availability, quality, or permission. For the working record, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the policy reviewer to record destination fit before the rights check.

• Confirm exact provider and version For the working record, preserve the control log, and ask the identity reviewer to record evidence freshness before the rights check.
• Date every changing fact For the working record, preserve the rights memo, and ask the claims reviewer to record failure conditions before the rights check.
• Keep observations separate from documentation For the working record, preserve the evidence table, and ask the channel editor to record human approval before the rights check.

Record evidence, review the handoff, and name the next check

The record must distinguish documented facts, direct observations, and open questions. A similar name, search result, or third-party demonstration is not enough to establish current availability in SEELE or elsewhere. Run separate passes for craft, factual accuracy, identity and source rights, safety, accessibility, and destination requirements. Record the source and verification date for any changing platform, model, price, policy, privacy, export, or compatibility statement. If primary evidence is missing, publish the item only as a question or editorial planning step. The finished handoff must name the approver and preserve a path back to the authorized original. At this stage, preserve the failure note, and ask the channel editor to record visible continuity before the production checkpoint.