Define the procedure job before choosing a product

Treat “how to link notes in obsidian” as a step-by-step learning request, not as evidence that a feature exists. The action implied by the query is to add or connect an authorized element; the working object is editorial topic. Write the intended audience or user, authorized input, desired change, review owner, and finished handoff. Also state what the task excludes. This brief keeps search wording from turning into an unsupported promise about SEELE, a named vendor, a model, or an automatic result. In the decision log, preserve the source ledger, and ask the source custodian to record source fidelity before the scope confirmation.

• Input: a clear definition of the term, the reader's production context, authorized examples, and an explicit question to resolve In the decision log, preserve the brief version, and ask the production lead to record claim scope before the scope confirmation.
• Success: a bounded explanation or plan that identifies the next decision without inventing product access, controls, evidence, or outcomes In the decision log, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the continuity editor to record destination fit before the scope confirmation.
• Stop condition: missing rights, consent, safety review, primary evidence, or delivery authority In the decision log, preserve the control log, and ask the source custodian to record evidence freshness before the scope confirmation.

Use the how-to method method

Translate the request into an input, a reversible action, a checkpoint, and a finished handoff. Practice on a duplicate or non-sensitive sample, preserve the original, and stop when authorization, account access, safety, or factual uncertainty appears. For this query, sequence the work into reversible decisions and observable review points. Keep notes about assumptions, source dates, failed checks, and human decisions beside the working asset. The how-to-guides classification determines this learning sequence, while the authoritative taxonomy remains the only owner of the route. This page supplies editorial copy and cannot silently change the category, subhub, or URL. In the decision log, preserve the authorization record, and ask the workflow owner to record claim scope before the final sign-off.

Apply the topic orientation boundary

Treat ambiguous or weakly related search language as a question to clarify. Do not turn it into a SEELE capability, endorsement, factual claim, or interactive workflow without evidence. Work from a clear definition of the term, the reader's production context, authorized examples, and an explicit question to resolve. Review toward a bounded explanation or plan that identifies the next decision without inventing product access, controls, evidence, or outcomes. A polished draft is not enough: the reviewer must be able to see which source supports each factual statement, who authorized each asset or identity, and which product behavior is still an unanswered test question. Topic selection alone never establishes safety, availability, quality, or permission. During review, preserve the reference set, and ask the creative lead to record identity consent before the scope confirmation.

• Clarify the intended meaning During review, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the model evaluator to record source fidelity before the scope confirmation.
• Choose an authorized example During review, preserve the brief version, and ask the creative lead to record failure conditions before the acceptance review.
• Name the evidence needed for the next decision During review, preserve the source ledger, and ask the model evaluator to record control availability before the acceptance review.

Record evidence, review the handoff, and name the next check

The result should be reproducible from the written decisions while leaving product-specific buttons, limits, and account behavior to current official documentation rather than invented steps. Run separate passes for craft, factual accuracy, identity and source rights, safety, accessibility, and destination requirements. Record the source and verification date for any changing platform, model, price, policy, privacy, export, or compatibility statement. If primary evidence is missing, publish the item only as a question or editorial planning step. The finished handoff must name the approver and preserve a path back to the authorized original. At this stage, preserve the test fixture, and ask the claims reviewer to record evidence freshness before the editorial approval.