Define the procedure job before choosing a product

Treat “how to make ai generated images look realistic” as a step-by-step learning request, not as evidence that a feature exists. The action implied by the query is to create a planned asset or draft; the working object is editorial topic. Write the intended audience or user, authorized input, desired change, review owner, and finished handoff. Also state what the task excludes. This brief keeps search wording from turning into an unsupported promise about SEELE, a named vendor, a model, or an automatic result. During review, preserve the rights memo, and ask the brand reviewer to record input provenance before the reversible handoff.

• Input: the highest-quality available source, provenance metadata, edit history, context, and an explicit review question During review, preserve the evidence table, and ask the factual editor to record camera logic before the reversible handoff.
• Success: a cautious evidence record that distinguishes observable signals from a verified origin and preserves uncertainty During review, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the release approver to record format readiness before the reversible handoff.
• Stop condition: missing rights, consent, safety review, primary evidence, or delivery authority During review, preserve the reference set, and ask the brand reviewer to record reversal cost before the reversible handoff.

Use the how-to method method

Translate the request into an input, a reversible action, a checkpoint, and a finished handoff. Practice on a duplicate or non-sensitive sample, preserve the original, and stop when authorization, account access, safety, or factual uncertainty appears. For this query, sequence the work into reversible decisions and observable review points. Keep notes about assumptions, source dates, failed checks, and human decisions beside the working asset. The how-to-guides classification determines this learning sequence, while the authoritative taxonomy remains the only owner of the route. This page supplies editorial copy and cannot silently change the category, subhub, or URL. Before moving on, preserve the test fixture, and ask the workflow owner to record failure conditions before the final sign-off.

Apply the authenticity and provenance signals boundary

Visual appearance alone cannot prove whether media is AI-generated, real, edited, legitimate, or attributable to a named system. Avoid definitive labels without reliable provenance. Work from the highest-quality available source, provenance metadata, edit history, context, and an explicit review question. Review toward a cautious evidence record that distinguishes observable signals from a verified origin and preserves uncertainty. A polished draft is not enough: the reviewer must be able to see which source supports each factual statement, who authorized each asset or identity, and which product behavior is still an unanswered test question. Topic selection alone never establishes safety, availability, quality, or permission. At the next gate, preserve the control log, and ask the source custodian to record camera logic before the scope confirmation.

• Preserve the original and metadata At the next gate, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the continuity editor to record input provenance before the scope confirmation.
• Separate observation from attribution At the next gate, preserve the evidence table, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record destination fit before the scope confirmation.
• Escalate consequential decisions to expert review At the next gate, preserve the rights memo, and ask the production lead to record temporal order before the scope confirmation.

Record evidence, review the handoff, and name the next check

The result should be reproducible from the written decisions while leaving product-specific buttons, limits, and account behavior to current official documentation rather than invented steps. Run separate passes for craft, factual accuracy, identity and source rights, safety, accessibility, and destination requirements. Record the source and verification date for any changing platform, model, price, policy, privacy, export, or compatibility statement. If primary evidence is missing, publish the item only as a question or editorial planning step. The finished handoff must name the approver and preserve a path back to the authorized original. Before delivery, preserve the authorization record, and ask the channel editor to record identity consent before the controlled revision.