Define the planning job before choosing a product

Treat “nano banana pro storyboard” as a production-planning request, not as evidence that a feature exists. The action implied by the query is to clarify the term and choose the next production decision; the working object is storyboard. Write the intended audience or user, authorized input, desired change, review owner, and finished handoff. Also state what the task excludes. This brief keeps search wording from turning into an unsupported promise about SEELE, a named vendor, a model, or an automatic result. For the named reviewer, preserve the decision history, and ask the production lead to record destination fit before the controlled revision.

• Input: the exact product, provider, version, region, account surface, production job, and verification date For the named reviewer, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record evidence freshness before the controlled revision.
• Success: a dated evidence ledger covering identity, access, documented inputs, observable controls, outputs, limitations, and unresolved gaps For the named reviewer, preserve the review copy, and ask the continuity editor to record camera logic before the controlled revision.
• Stop condition: missing rights, consent, safety review, primary evidence, or delivery authority For the named reviewer, preserve the test fixture, and ask the source custodian to record disclosure clarity before the controlled revision.

Use the planning and scripting method

Begin with audience, purpose, source material, key message, sequence, and delivery condition. Draft the smallest useful outline, map each beat to evidence or an authorized asset, then revise structure before polishing language or imagining generated footage. For this query, turn the idea into a brief, ordered beats, review ownership, and a delivery contract. Keep notes about assumptions, source dates, failed checks, and human decisions beside the working asset. The planning-scripting classification determines this learning sequence, while the authoritative taxonomy remains the only owner of the route. This page supplies editorial copy and cannot silently change the category, subhub, or URL. For the named reviewer, preserve the reference set, and ask the delivery owner to record evidence freshness before the delivery pass.

Apply the named platform or model facts boundary

Do not infer SEELE support, model access, quality, legitimacy, censorship, ownership, API behavior, or compatibility from the query. Verify first-party documentation and direct observations on the use date. Work from the exact product, provider, version, region, account surface, production job, and verification date. Review toward a dated evidence ledger covering identity, access, documented inputs, observable controls, outputs, limitations, and unresolved gaps. A polished draft is not enough: the reviewer must be able to see which source supports each factual statement, who authorized each asset or identity, and which product behavior is still an unanswered test question. Topic selection alone never establishes safety, availability, quality, or permission. During review, preserve the test fixture, and ask the channel editor to record claim scope before the production checkpoint.

• Confirm exact provider and version During review, preserve the review copy, and ask the claims reviewer to record reversal cost before the editorial approval.
• Date every changing fact During review, preserve the continuity note, and ask the creative lead to record claim scope before the release review.
• Keep observations separate from documentation During review, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the model evaluator to record reversal cost before the production checkpoint.

Record evidence, review the handoff, and name the next check

The handoff should let a reviewer trace every beat to its source, see what remains a creative proposal, and identify which script, board, transcript, or description decision needs approval next. Run separate passes for craft, factual accuracy, identity and source rights, safety, accessibility, and destination requirements. Record the source and verification date for any changing platform, model, price, policy, privacy, export, or compatibility statement. If primary evidence is missing, publish the item only as a question or editorial planning step. The finished handoff must name the approver and preserve a path back to the authorized original. Before revision, preserve the reference set, and ask the rights reviewer to record control availability before the fallback decision.