Start creating
Menu
Start creating

SEELE TV / Prompt archive

nanobanana 提示 词: model prompt

Use “nanobanana 提示 词” to shape model-specific prompt plan within model-specific prompts. Focus on portable shot contract, dated model-control notes, version and access verification, then keep each variation anchored to the same subject, action, setting, and intended ending.

Production workflowPrompt directions

Collection categories

Generation method

Choose how the production brief begins.

Prompt 01Media reserved
Text generationScene16:915 sec
01

Nanobanana 提示 词 — Establish the world

Create a 15 sec 16:9 video direction for “nanobanana 提示 词” in the context of model prompts.
Subject and action: Show the subject entering the setting, performing one clear action, and reaching a visible end state across three connected beats.
Camera and edit: Begin with a restrained wide establishing frame, move to a medium action shot, and finish on one legible detail.
Continuity: Preserve subject identity, wardrobe, hero-object details, geography, lighting direction, and direction of travel across every shot.
Sound: Use original location ambience, tactile action sounds, and no copyrighted music.
Production focus: Make reviewed nanobanana 提示 词 workflow and model specific prompts checklist visible through the scene rather than explaining it with text overlays.
Delivery: 16:9, 15 sec, text-led; realistic motion and material behavior; no logos, fake interface, duplicated subjects, impossible physics, or unsupported result claims.
Start Creating Source reserved
Prompt 02Media reserved
Text generationSocial9:1612 sec
02

Nanobanana 提示 词 — Build a vertical social cut

Create a 12 sec 9:16 video direction for “nanobanana 提示 词” in the context of model prompts.
Subject and action: Communicate the premise in the first beat, demonstrate one change in the middle, and hold the result long enough to read.
Camera and edit: Use an immediate close opening, two readable handheld reframes, and a stable final composition designed for a vertical crop.
Continuity: Preserve subject identity, wardrobe, hero-object details, geography, lighting direction, and direction of travel across every shot.
Sound: Keep speech original and concise; connect cuts with room tone and motivated practical sounds.
Production focus: Make reviewed nanobanana 提示 词 workflow and model specific prompts checklist visible through the scene rather than explaining it with text overlays.
Delivery: 9:16, 12 sec, text-led; realistic motion and material behavior; no logos, fake interface, duplicated subjects, impossible physics, or unsupported result claims.
Start Creating Source reserved
Prompt 03Media reserved
Reference generationReference16:918 sec
03

Nanobanana 提示 词 — Preserve a supplied reference

Create a 18 sec 16:9 video direction for “nanobanana 提示 词” in the context of model prompts.
Subject and action: Introduce the referenced subject, show one physically plausible interaction, and return to a composition that can be checked against the source.
Camera and edit: Use the supplied reference as the identity, material, palette, and proportion constraint; cover it with wide, medium, and detail views.
Continuity: Preserve subject identity, wardrobe, hero-object details, geography, lighting direction, and direction of travel across every shot.
Sound: Use grounded ambience and synchronized object sounds; do not imply audio that is not established by the scene.
Production focus: Make reviewed nanobanana 提示 词 workflow and model specific prompts checklist visible through the scene rather than explaining it with text overlays.
Delivery: 16:9, 18 sec, reference-led; realistic motion and material behavior; no logos, fake interface, duplicated subjects, impossible physics, or unsupported result claims.
Start Creating Source reserved
Prompt 04Media reserved
Reference generationContinuity4:320 sec
04

Nanobanana 提示 词 — Stress-test continuity

Create a 20 sec 4:3 video direction for “nanobanana 提示 词” in the context of model prompts.
Subject and action: Repeat one subject, one hero object, and one spatial relationship through setup, action, reaction, and resolved end frame.
Camera and edit: Stage four connected shots with consistent screen direction, eyelines, lens logic, and motivated camera movement.
Continuity: Preserve subject identity, wardrobe, hero-object details, geography, lighting direction, and direction of travel across every shot.
Sound: Carry one continuous ambient bed across edits and add only original, scene-motivated effects.
Production focus: Make reviewed nanobanana 提示 词 workflow and model specific prompts checklist visible through the scene rather than explaining it with text overlays.
Delivery: 4:3, 20 sec, reference-led; realistic motion and material behavior; no logos, fake interface, duplicated subjects, impossible physics, or unsupported result claims.
Start Creating Source reserved

How to use the Model flexible archive

Treat the prompt as a production brief.

01

Define the model-specific prompt plan behind nanobanana 提示 词

For Nanobanana 提示 词, state the subject, environment, action objective, emotional beat, and end condition in plain production language. These invariants keep model-specific prompts variants comparable instead of producing unrelated ideas. Resolve the exact named model or version, then keep creative direction separate from claims about access, syntax, limits, price, audio, duration, quality, or availability. Use only dated first-party evidence for those changing facts. Write the decision owner and intended handoff beside the brief so a search phrase cannot be mistaken for a verified product capability or an instruction that has already been executed. Before delivery, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the source custodian to record camera logic before the controlled revision.

02

Apply the model-specific prompts structure

Write a portable core prompt before adding any vendor or version vocabulary. Keep the subject, action, spatial relationship, shot order, continuity anchors, and end condition independent from a named model. Put model-specific controls in a separate dated note so an unsupported parameter cannot quietly become part of the creative brief. For “nanobanana 提示 词”, keep a visible distinction between required content, optional treatment, exclusions, and facts that need evidence. That structure gives controlled variants a stable baseline and lets a reviewer identify which instruction caused a material change. Before delivery, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the creative lead to record disclosure clarity before the source comparison.

03

Prepare authorized inputs for general creative direction

This query calls for the intended medium, audience, purpose, authorized sources, subject, action, context, constraints, reviewer, and delivery condition. Turn broad or ambiguous words into observable choices. Define one outcome, order the important decisions, remove contradictions, and keep optional style language separate from required content. Record the source, permission, intended audience, protected details, and reviewer before testing language. The goal is a traceable creative proposal, not an assumption that a named platform, model, or workspace will perform the requested action. For this checkpoint, preserve the brief version, and ask the channel editor to record temporal order before the dated decision.

04

Build controlled variants and observable acceptance checks

For this owner, the first review pass should make nanobanana, 提示 observable rather than merely decorative. Change one meaningful dimension per version and label the hypothesis, invariant details, expected difference, and rejection condition. The brief is reviewable when its creative core remains portable and every model-dependent statement is either cited with a date or clearly labeled as an open test question. Keep failed variants in the decision record so the final wording is explainable rather than selected by impression alone. Before moving on, preserve the evidence table, and ask the identity reviewer to record temporal order before the source comparison.

05

Review authorization, safety, and changing product facts

Treat unclear product, entity, and platform references as questions. Do not invent capabilities, facts, identities, access terms, or production results to fill a gap in the query. The named third-party model or product requires dated first-party verification for identity, version, access, inputs, controls, limits, pricing, licensing, and output behavior; this page makes no comparison or SEELE availability claim. Treat every named model, competitor, access term, platform rule, identity use, commercial claim, and output specification as a dated evidence question. If authorization or first-party support is missing, keep the language editorial, stop the handoff, and record the unresolved gap instead of inventing a workaround. For the working record, preserve the continuity note, and ask the production lead to record source fidelity before the workflow transfer.

06

Approve a reversible prompt handoff

Confirm the exact provider, version, access surface, accepted inputs, controls, and output behavior against current first-party material before a test. A model name in a query is an evaluation target, not proof that SEELE or any other product currently exposes it. Before approving “nanobanana 提示 词”, check purpose, source rights, identity consent, factual support, continuity, disclosure, destination requirements, and the named review owner. Preserve the original brief and version notes. This handoff supplies authored guidance only and neither runs generation nor guarantees access, quality, speed, licensing, publishing, downloads, or outcomes. For the working record, preserve the failure note, and ask the creative lead to record failure conditions before the rights check.

Evidence boundary

Use the source, rights and current workspace controls as the acceptance boundary.

Before you hand off

Questions to resolve.

Does this “nanobanana 提示 词” page execute a prompt or generate media?

No. It is an editorial planning and evaluation page. It does not upload a source, call a model, expose verified controls, execute generation, publish media, or display a generated result. For this decision, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record disclosure clarity before the acceptance review.

How should a reviewer evaluate this model-specific prompt plan?

Keep one stable brief, change one instruction at a time, record the expected difference, and compare the result with explicit acceptance and rejection criteria. The brief is reviewable when its creative core remains portable and every model-dependent statement is either cited with a date or clearly labeled as an open test question. For this decision, preserve the decision history, and ask the production lead to record camera logic before the acceptance review.

What evidence boundary applies to these model-specific prompts?

The named third-party model or product requires dated first-party verification for identity, version, access, inputs, controls, limits, pricing, licensing, and output behavior; this page makes no comparison or SEELE availability claim. Verify changing model, product, price, access, policy, license, input, output, and entitlement statements in dated first-party sources. Search demand and prompt wording are not capability evidence. For this decision, preserve the control log, and ask the workflow owner to record evidence freshness before the acceptance review.

Continue the workflow

Take a prepared brief into the workspace.

Continue in the SEELE workspace to inspect the currently available Film & CG workflow.

Try it free