Turn Prompt Full into a reviewable shot contract.

Write the invariant shot intent first

For Prompt Full, state the subject, environment, action objective, emotional beat, and end condition in plain production language. These invariants keep general video prompts variants comparable instead of producing unrelated ideas. For this section 1, save a input manifest; have the product specialist review licensing; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a dated decision until the named limitation is resolved. Keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.

Turn the topic into a repeatable method

Move from definition to a small practice sequence, then review the result against explicit craft, rights, and delivery checks. Keep vendor-specific behavior outside the method unless a source verifies it. For this section 2, save a acceptance matrix; have the art director review delivery fit; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a dated decision until the named limitation is resolved. Keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.

Layer camera, timing, continuity, and sound

Add framing and camera movement only when they support the action. Mark temporal beats, preserve identity and environment anchors, describe sound as intent rather than a guaranteed feature, and name artifacts or changes to avoid. For this section 3, save a camera plan; have the post supervisor review editability; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a dated decision until the named limitation is resolved. Keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.

• Subject and action — record decision memo, motion designer, claim support, and evidence-backed brief; keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.
• Framing and camera relationship — record rights record, prompt designer, source rights, and editorial approval; keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.
• Beat order and end state — record versioned handoff, fact checker, visual hierarchy, and editorial approval; keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.
• Continuity, sound intent, and exclusions — record delivery checklist, producer, motion coherence, and editorial approval; keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.

Create controlled prompt variants

Change one meaningful dimension per version, such as shot size, movement, pacing, or performance intensity. Label the hypothesis for each variant so review can identify which instruction caused the difference. For this section 4, save a asset ledger; have the media owner review source rights; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a dated decision until the named limitation is resolved. Keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.

Review the output without inventing model controls

Check whether the requested action reads clearly, the camera supports the beat, references remain coherent, and the ending is usable. A prompt template does not prove that any named model, duration, audio mode, or parameter is available. For this section 5, save a decision memo; have the art director review visual hierarchy; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a dated decision until the named limitation is resolved. Keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.

Keep the evidence ledger attached to the decision

Partial evidence was supplied, but it does not establish product support or a complete capability, customer, or performance claim. Record the source, verification date, claim scope, unresolved gap, and the decision that the evidence can support. Search demand must never be reused as capability proof. For this section 6, save a rights record; have the editor review motion coherence; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a dated decision until the named limitation is resolved. Keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.

Build a specific test brief for prompt full

Start with a bounded text brief with visible constraints and an end state. Define one observable change, protected details, a stopping rule, and the named reviewer. The intended output is a reusable prompt contract with controlled variants. Test one variable per version, preserve the source and settings, and compare results at the actual delivery size instead of choosing from an unrecorded impression. For this topic test, save a prompt brief; have the legal reviewer review temporal stability; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a source-preserving edit until the named limitation is resolved. Keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.

• Primary query: prompt full; test record: acceptance matrix, legal reviewer, revision control, and workflow decision; keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.
• Editorial owner: keyword-expansion:0321; decision record: frame review, post supervisor, message clarity, and stakeholder sign-off; keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.
• Source scope: a user-provided competitor-gap export dated 2026-08-05 supports topic prioritization only; source review: versioned handoff, editor, action readability, and production checkpoint; keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.

Separate topic fit from product proof

A dated, user-provided competitor-gap export supports only the decision to cover “prompt full.” It does not prove audience demand, SEELE capability, third-party behavior, commercial value, or a likely outcome. Verify product-specific statements against current first-party documentation and a recorded representative test. For this source review, save a prompt brief; have the motion designer review identity consent; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a dated decision until the named limitation is resolved. Keep full evidence separate from prompt assumptions.