01Define the prompt-authoring brief behind prompt.gacha
For Prompt.gacha, state the subject, environment, action objective, emotional beat, and end condition in plain production language. These invariants keep general prompt planning variants comparable instead of producing unrelated ideas. Clarify the intended medium and outcome, then write subject, action, context, composition, constraints, and an observable end condition. Prefer concrete relationships over adjective lists, and separate facts from proposed visual treatment. Write the decision owner and intended handoff beside the brief so a search phrase cannot be mistaken for a verified product capability or an instruction that has already been executed. At handoff, preserve the rights memo, and ask the model evaluator to record destination fit before the acceptance review.
02Apply the general prompt planning structure
Turn the phrase into a production brief with a medium, subject, action, setting, composition, ordered beats, constraints, and a reviewable end state. Separate the durable creative direction from syntax that belongs to a particular interface. This makes the prompt useful even when tools, model names, or accepted parameters change. For “prompt.gacha”, keep a visible distinction between required content, optional treatment, exclusions, and facts that need evidence. That structure gives controlled variants a stable baseline and lets a reviewer identify which instruction caused a material change. At handoff, preserve the test fixture, and ask the policy reviewer to record claim scope before the acceptance review.
03Prepare authorized inputs for character and fictional visual design
This query calls for an original or licensed character brief, silhouette, setting, action, reference rights, tone, and the visual details that must remain consistent. Build from shape, pose, material, expression, palette, staging, and action rather than relying on an unexplained style label. Identify what is original, referenced, or merely proposed. Record the source, permission, intended audience, protected details, and reviewer before testing language. The goal is a traceable creative proposal, not an assumption that a named platform, model, or workspace will perform the requested action. For the named reviewer, preserve the control log, and ask the creative lead to record failure conditions before the scope confirmation.
04Build controlled variants and observable acceptance checks
For this owner, the first review pass should make gacha observable rather than merely decorative. Change one meaningful dimension per version and label the hypothesis, invariant details, expected difference, and rejection condition. The prompt is ready for review when every phrase changes a meaningful decision, contradictions are removed, and a second reader can describe the expected result without inventing missing context. Keep failed variants in the decision record so the final wording is explainable rather than selected by impression alone. During review, preserve the authorization record, and ask the delivery owner to record disclosure clarity before the controlled revision.
05Review authorization, safety, and changing product facts
Do not imply rights to a character, franchise, artist style, or reference image; verify licenses and avoid deceptive real-person identity transfer. Use only authorized source material, preserve attribution and provenance, avoid deceptive identity or factual claims, and verify any changing product or platform statement in current first-party documentation. Treat every named model, competitor, access term, platform rule, identity use, commercial claim, and output specification as a dated evidence question. If authorization or first-party support is missing, keep the language editorial, stop the handoff, and record the unresolved gap instead of inventing a workaround. At the next gate, preserve the authorization record, and ask the brand reviewer to record evidence freshness before the workflow transfer.
06Approve a reversible prompt handoff
Read the prompt once for intent, once for visual or temporal coherence, and once for rights and factual risk. Remove decorative terms that do not change an observable decision, then test controlled variants rather than rewriting every instruction at the same time. Before approving “prompt.gacha”, check purpose, source rights, identity consent, factual support, continuity, disclosure, destination requirements, and the named review owner. Preserve the original brief and version notes. This handoff supplies authored guidance only and neither runs generation nor guarantees access, quality, speed, licensing, publishing, downloads, or outcomes. At the next gate, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the factual editor to record format readiness before the workflow transfer.
