SEELE TV / Prompt archive

Write repeatability prompts that expose one failure mode at a time.

video repeatability test prompts focuses on a controlled prompt set should make inconsistency diagnosable. Keep the production goal stable, isolate the constraint under examination, define acceptable variation, and resist adding decorative details that create several new reasons for a clip to diverge.

Production workflowPrompt directions

Collection categories

Generation method

Choose how the production brief begins.

Prompt 01Media reserved
Text generationScene16:915 sec
01

Video Repeatability Test Prompts — Establish the world

Create a 15 sec 16:9 video direction for “video repeatability test prompts” in the context of trend ten out of ten repeatability.
Subject and action: Show the subject entering the setting, performing one clear action, and reaching a visible end state across three connected beats.
Camera and edit: Begin with a restrained wide establishing frame, move to a medium action shot, and finish on one legible detail.
Continuity: Preserve subject identity, wardrobe, hero-object details, geography, lighting direction, and direction of travel across every shot.
Sound: Use original location ambience, tactile action sounds, and no copyrighted music.
Production focus: Make fixed prompt trial and video invariant prompt visible through the scene rather than explaining it with text overlays.
Delivery: 16:9, 15 sec, text-led; realistic motion and material behavior; no logos, fake interface, duplicated subjects, impossible physics, or unsupported result claims.
Start Creating Source reserved
Prompt 02Media reserved
Text generationSocial9:1612 sec
02

Video Repeatability Test Prompts — Build a vertical social cut

Create a 12 sec 9:16 video direction for “video repeatability test prompts” in the context of trend ten out of ten repeatability.
Subject and action: Communicate the premise in the first beat, demonstrate one change in the middle, and hold the result long enough to read.
Camera and edit: Use an immediate close opening, two readable handheld reframes, and a stable final composition designed for a vertical crop.
Continuity: Preserve subject identity, wardrobe, hero-object details, geography, lighting direction, and direction of travel across every shot.
Sound: Keep speech original and concise; connect cuts with room tone and motivated practical sounds.
Production focus: Make fixed prompt trial and video invariant prompt visible through the scene rather than explaining it with text overlays.
Delivery: 9:16, 12 sec, text-led; realistic motion and material behavior; no logos, fake interface, duplicated subjects, impossible physics, or unsupported result claims.
Start Creating Source reserved
Prompt 03Media reserved
Reference generationReference16:918 sec
03

Video Repeatability Test Prompts — Preserve a supplied reference

Create a 18 sec 16:9 video direction for “video repeatability test prompts” in the context of trend ten out of ten repeatability.
Subject and action: Introduce the referenced subject, show one physically plausible interaction, and return to a composition that can be checked against the source.
Camera and edit: Use the supplied reference as the identity, material, palette, and proportion constraint; cover it with wide, medium, and detail views.
Continuity: Preserve subject identity, wardrobe, hero-object details, geography, lighting direction, and direction of travel across every shot.
Sound: Use grounded ambience and synchronized object sounds; do not imply audio that is not established by the scene.
Production focus: Make fixed prompt trial and video invariant prompt visible through the scene rather than explaining it with text overlays.
Delivery: 16:9, 18 sec, reference-led; realistic motion and material behavior; no logos, fake interface, duplicated subjects, impossible physics, or unsupported result claims.
Start Creating Source reserved
Prompt 04Media reserved
Reference generationContinuity4:320 sec
04

Video Repeatability Test Prompts — Stress-test continuity

Create a 20 sec 4:3 video direction for “video repeatability test prompts” in the context of trend ten out of ten repeatability.
Subject and action: Repeat one subject, one hero object, and one spatial relationship through setup, action, reaction, and resolved end frame.
Camera and edit: Stage four connected shots with consistent screen direction, eyelines, lens logic, and motivated camera movement.
Continuity: Preserve subject identity, wardrobe, hero-object details, geography, lighting direction, and direction of travel across every shot.
Sound: Carry one continuous ambient bed across edits and add only original, scene-motivated effects.
Production focus: Make fixed prompt trial and video invariant prompt visible through the scene rather than explaining it with text overlays.
Delivery: 4:3, 20 sec, reference-led; realistic motion and material behavior; no logos, fake interface, duplicated subjects, impossible physics, or unsupported result claims.
Start Creating Source reserved

How to use the Model flexible archive

Treat the prompt as a production brief.

01

Start with a low-ambiguity baseline

Specify one subject, one setting, one ordered action, one camera behavior, a short timing envelope, and explicit exclusions. Avoid brand facts, small text, complex crowds, and multiple transformations in the baseline unless one of those is the variable under test. The baseline should reveal whether the core instruction survives repeated attempts before adding production complexity.

02

Create orthogonal stress prompts

Add separate trials for identity under camera movement, object geometry during interaction, action order across cuts, dialogue and mouth timing, stereo sound placement, and text persistence. Change only the relevant constraint between trials. Label every prompt version so a reviewer can connect a failure to the instruction change instead of comparing unrelated creative scenes.

03

Pair each prompt with an observation form

Attach the required invariants, acceptable deviations, attempt budget, and rejection conditions directly to the prompt. Capture outputs in generation order and avoid choosing a favorite before scoring. If the language itself is ambiguous, revise the test contract and begin a new version; do not count a changed prompt as another attempt in the original series.

Evidence boundary

Use the source, rights and current workspace controls as the acceptance boundary.

Before you hand off

Questions to resolve.

Are these benchmark prompts?

No. They are editorial test scaffolds for a team to adapt and disclose. They do not provide a benchmark result or establish performance for any model or product.

Should every attempt look identical?

Only if pixel-level identity is the declared test, which is uncommon for creative generation. Most production tests distinguish required semantic invariants from acceptable visual variation.

Continue the workflow

Take a prepared brief into the workspace.

Continue in the SEELE workspace to inspect the currently available Film & CG workflow.

Try it free