- 01
Define the workflow learning job
Treat “ai image generation” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First turn the query into a repeatable sequence with explicit inputs, review points, and a reversible handoff. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. While evidence is current, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the policy reviewer to record human approval before the delivery pass.
- 02
Prepare inputs for image generation
For this topic, assemble a visual brief, authorized references, composition goals, style constraints, exclusions, and output requirements. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. While evidence is current, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the production lead to record failure conditions before the evidence refresh.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse At this stage, preserve the review copy, and ask the identity reviewer to record control availability before the production checkpoint.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history At this stage, preserve the test fixture, and ask the claims reviewer to record evidence freshness before the production checkpoint.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition At this stage, preserve the source ledger, and ask the creative lead to record temporal order before the production checkpoint.
- 03
Test observable controls for ai image generation
A bounded evaluation should inspect subject fidelity, composition, typography, material detail, variation strategy, and revision consistency. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. At this stage, preserve the decision history, and ask the channel editor to record format readiness before the production checkpoint.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
A search query does not prove access to a model, commercial rights, exact dimensions, or consistent output quality. Use only authorized media, separate observed behavior from marketing language, and check current first-party documentation for any product-specific claim. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. While evidence is current, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the channel editor to record camera logic before the source comparison.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “ai image generation”, compare candidates with the brief, inspect fine detail and text, and record which instruction caused each useful change. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. For a controlled test, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the factual editor to record visible continuity before the bounded test.