- 01
Define the tool evaluation job
Treat “aifaceswap.io” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First clarify the requested job, observe current controls on a bounded test, and document workflow fit and evidence gaps. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. For this decision, preserve the review copy, and ask the identity reviewer to record format readiness before the evidence refresh.
- 02
Prepare inputs for identity transformation
For this topic, assemble documented consent from every identifiable person, authorized media, a legitimate purpose, and a disclosure plan. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. For this decision, preserve the evidence table, and ask the identity reviewer to record disclosure clarity before the rights check.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse At the next gate, preserve the test fixture, and ask the delivery owner to record reversal cost before the acceptance review.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history At the next gate, preserve the review copy, and ask the workflow owner to record format readiness before the acceptance review.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition At the next gate, preserve the brief version, and ask the factual editor to record failure conditions before the acceptance review.
- 03
Test observable controls for aifaceswap.io
A bounded evaluation should inspect identity scope, temporal consistency, expression fidelity, edit reversibility, provenance, and disclosure. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. At the next gate, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the source custodian to record identity consent before the fallback decision.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Do not enable impersonation, non-consensual face or body replacement, deceptive endorsements, or evasion of safeguards. Any identifiable face, body, or voice requires explicit permission, a legitimate purpose, disclosure where required, and a human check against impersonation or deceptive endorsement. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. At handoff, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the creative lead to record reversal cost before the fallback decision.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “aifaceswap.io”, verify consent, inspect every frame for identity errors, preserve source records, and obtain a named human approval. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. Before revision, preserve the evidence table, and ask the continuity editor to record disclosure clarity before the bounded test.