- 01
Define the workflow learning job
Treat “change lighting” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First turn the query into a repeatable sequence with explicit inputs, review points, and a reversible handoff. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. Before approval, preserve the evidence table, and ask the delivery owner to record camera logic before the fallback decision.
- 02
Prepare inputs for video and image editing
For this topic, assemble authorized source assets, an edit brief, protected elements, visual references, destination specs, and a version plan. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. Before approval, preserve the review copy, and ask the delivery owner to record evidence freshness before the acceptance review.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse For the working record, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the claims reviewer to record input provenance before the reversible handoff.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history For the working record, preserve the reference set, and ask the channel editor to record camera logic before the reversible handoff.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition For the working record, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the policy reviewer to record claim scope before the reversible handoff.
- 03
Test observable controls for change lighting
A bounded evaluation should inspect selection accuracy, timing, framing, color, compositing, continuity, undo behavior, and export readiness. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. During review, preserve the rights memo, and ask the channel editor to record evidence freshness before the final sign-off.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
The page is an editing evaluation guide and does not upload, alter, render, export, or download media. Use only authorized media, separate observed behavior from marketing language, and check current first-party documentation for any product-specific claim. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. For this checkpoint, preserve the rights memo, and ask the model evaluator to record human approval before the scope confirmation.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “change lighting”, compare revisions with the source and brief, inspect high-risk details, and preserve an approved reversible version. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. Before delivery, preserve the rights memo, and ask the identity reviewer to record evidence freshness before the rights check.