- 01
Define the tool evaluation job
Treat “color+grading+services” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First clarify the requested job, observe current controls on a bounded test, and document workflow fit and evidence gaps. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. Before moving on, preserve the control log, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record source fidelity before the scope confirmation.
- 02
Prepare inputs for video and image editing
For this topic, assemble authorized source assets, an edit brief, protected elements, visual references, destination specs, and a version plan. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. Before moving on, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the source custodian to record disclosure clarity before the scope confirmation.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse For a reversible workflow, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the channel editor to record format readiness before the evidence refresh.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history For a reversible workflow, preserve the continuity note, and ask the release approver to record human approval before the evidence refresh.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition For a reversible workflow, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the brand reviewer to record source fidelity before the rights check.
- 03
Test observable controls for color+grading+services
A bounded evaluation should inspect selection accuracy, timing, framing, color, compositing, continuity, undo behavior, and export readiness. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. For a reversible workflow, preserve the failure note, and ask the delivery owner to record control availability before the evidence refresh.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
The page is an editing evaluation guide and does not upload, alter, render, export, or download media. Use only authorized media, separate observed behavior from marketing language, and check current first-party documentation for any product-specific claim. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. At the next gate, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the delivery owner to record human approval before the reversible handoff.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “color+grading+services”, compare revisions with the source and brief, inspect high-risk details, and preserve an approved reversible version. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. Before moving on, preserve the review copy, and ask the model evaluator to record input provenance before the acceptance review.