- 01
Define the tool evaluation job
Treat “deepswapface” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First clarify the requested job, observe current controls on a bounded test, and document workflow fit and evidence gaps. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. For a reversible workflow, preserve the decision history, and ask the claims reviewer to record camera logic before the reversible handoff.
- 02
Prepare inputs for identity transformation
For this topic, assemble documented consent from every identifiable person, authorized media, a legitimate purpose, and a disclosure plan. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. For a reversible workflow, preserve the reference set, and ask the creative lead to record disclosure clarity before the dated decision.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse For a controlled test, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the policy reviewer to record input provenance before the release review.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history For a controlled test, preserve the decision history, and ask the creative lead to record visible continuity before the release review.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition For a controlled test, preserve the control log, and ask the production lead to record temporal order before the release review.
- 03
Test observable controls for deepswapface
A bounded evaluation should inspect identity scope, temporal consistency, expression fidelity, edit reversibility, provenance, and disclosure. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. For a controlled test, preserve the test fixture, and ask the model evaluator to record claim scope before the release review.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Do not enable impersonation, non-consensual face or body replacement, deceptive endorsements, or evasion of safeguards. Any identifiable face, body, or voice requires explicit permission, a legitimate purpose, disclosure where required, and a human check against impersonation or deceptive endorsement. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. In the decision log, preserve the reference set, and ask the delivery owner to record control availability before the scope confirmation.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “deepswapface”, verify consent, inspect every frame for identity errors, preserve source records, and obtain a named human approval. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. Before moving on, preserve the reference set, and ask the brand reviewer to record format readiness before the bounded test.