- 01
Define the tool job and source contract
For Figure Generator, specify the material entering the workflow, the transformation expected within general video generation, and the deliverable leaving it. Keep generation, editing, publishing, and measurement as separate responsibilities. For this section 1, save a camera plan; have the product specialist review reference integrity; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a production checkpoint until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- Name required input rights and formats — record revision log, technical reviewer, camera intent, and dated decision; keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- List controls that must be directly observable — record test worksheet, media owner, continuity, and dated decision; keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- Define a reversible review handoff — record annotated source board, brand reviewer, editability, and dated decision; keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- 02
Compare against a stable acceptance frame
Use the same inputs, review dimensions, and stopping rules for every candidate. Record tradeoffs separately from availability so a promising test is not mistaken for verified product support. For this section 2, save a delivery checklist; have the editor review source rights; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a production checkpoint until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- 03
Run a bounded tool test
Use one representative asset and a fixed brief. Observe what the interface actually accepts, which controls affect the result, how revisions behave, and what must still be completed elsewhere. Record failures as carefully as successes. For this section 3, save a input manifest; have the rights reviewer review temporal stability; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a production checkpoint until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- 04
Select on workflow fit, not implied automation
Compare review effort, controllability, source fidelity, rights handling, and export readiness. A useful planning page does not upload media, invoke a model, or manufacture a result merely because the query contains the word tool. For this section 4, save a rights record; have the legal reviewer review action readability; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a release review until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- 05
Keep the evidence ledger attached to the decision
Partial evidence was supplied, but it does not establish product support or a complete capability, customer, or performance claim. Record the source, verification date, claim scope, unresolved gap, and the decision that the evidence can support. Search demand must never be reused as capability proof. For this section 5, save a versioned handoff; have the visual lead review camera intent; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a release review until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- 06
Build a specific test brief for figure generator
Start with a rights-cleared representative source and a written acceptance brief. Define one observable change, protected details, a stopping rule, and the named reviewer. The intended output is a reviewable visual-production brief and evidence-aware handoff. Test one variable per version, preserve the source and settings, and compare results at the actual delivery size instead of choosing from an unrecorded impression. For this topic test, save a rights record; have the art director review licensing; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a editorial approval until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- Primary query: figure generator; test record: frame review, channel owner, reference integrity, and evidence-backed brief; keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- Editorial owner: keyword-expansion:0448; decision record: acceptance matrix, channel owner, reference integrity, and reversible handoff; keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- Source scope: a user-provided competitor-gap export dated 2026-08-05 supports topic prioritization only; source review: evidence ledger, channel owner, visual hierarchy, and reversible handoff; keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.
- 07
Separate topic fit from product proof
A dated, user-provided competitor-gap export supports only the decision to cover “figure generator.” It does not prove audience demand, SEELE capability, third-party behavior, commercial value, or a likely outcome. Verify product-specific statements against current first-party documentation and a recorded representative test. For this source review, save a frame review; have the rights reviewer review delivery fit; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a release review until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from figure assumptions.