- 01
Define the workflow learning job
Treat “figurines from photos” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First turn the query into a repeatable sequence with explicit inputs, review points, and a reversible handoff. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. For the named reviewer, preserve the control log, and ask the channel editor to record failure conditions before the evidence refresh.
- 02
Prepare inputs for 3D object generation
For this topic, assemble reference views, scale cues, topology needs, material references, and the target renderer. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. For the named reviewer, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the identity reviewer to record input provenance before the rights check.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse For the named reviewer, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the model evaluator to record control availability before the rights check.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history For the named reviewer, preserve the continuity note, and ask the creative lead to record failure conditions before the rights check.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition For the named reviewer, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the policy reviewer to record format readiness before the rights check.
- 03
Test observable controls for figurines from photos
A bounded evaluation should inspect shape fidelity, silhouette, topology, UV readiness, material separation, and export compatibility. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. For the named reviewer, preserve the failure note, and ask the channel editor to record temporal order before the rights check.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Do not infer clean topology, rigging, licensing, or production-ready exports from a generated preview. Use only authorized media, separate observed behavior from marketing language, and check current first-party documentation for any product-specific claim. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. Before moving on, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the channel editor to record evidence freshness before the dated decision.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “figurines from photos”, inspect the mesh from multiple angles, test deformation when relevant, and validate scale and materials in the destination scene. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. In the decision log, preserve the review copy, and ask the continuity editor to record claim scope before the fallback decision.