- 01
Define the access and terms evaluation job
Treat “free face swap” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First verify current pricing, entitlement, limits, licensing, privacy, and delivery terms in first-party documentation. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. During review, preserve the continuity note, and ask the identity reviewer to record destination fit before the rights check.
- 02
Prepare inputs for identity transformation
For this topic, assemble documented consent from every identifiable person, authorized media, a legitimate purpose, and a disclosure plan. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. During review, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the identity reviewer to record human approval before the evidence refresh.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse For the working record, preserve the failure note, and ask the source custodian to record human approval before the reversible handoff.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history For the working record, preserve the authorization record, and ask the release approver to record reversal cost before the reversible handoff.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition For the working record, preserve the rights memo, and ask the delivery owner to record evidence freshness before the reversible handoff.
- 03
Test observable controls for free face swap
A bounded evaluation should inspect identity scope, temporal consistency, expression fidelity, edit reversibility, provenance, and disclosure. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. For the working record, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the brand reviewer to record claim scope before the dated decision.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Do not enable impersonation, non-consensual face or body replacement, deceptive endorsements, or evasion of safeguards. Any identifiable face, body, or voice requires explicit permission, a legitimate purpose, disclosure where required, and a human check against impersonation or deceptive endorsement. Words about free access, unlimited use, downloads, pricing, or licensing are query language rather than promises; verify current first-party terms before relying on them. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. For this decision, preserve the decision history, and ask the model evaluator to record claim scope before the acceptance review.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “free face swap”, verify consent, inspect every frame for identity errors, preserve source records, and obtain a named human approval. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. Before delivery, preserve the decision history, and ask the continuity editor to record input provenance before the workflow transfer.