- 01
Define the generation workflow job
Treat “headshot generator” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First write a shot or asset contract, test one controlled variation, and plan the human finishing work. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. For a reversible workflow, preserve the authorization record, and ask the production lead to record evidence freshness before the rights check.
- 02
Prepare inputs for visual creation tools
For this topic, assemble a clear creative job, authorized references, required controls, reviewer expectations, budget context, and delivery format. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. For a reversible workflow, preserve the source ledger, and ask the model evaluator to record control availability before the evidence refresh.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse At this stage, preserve the rights memo, and ask the continuity editor to record control availability before the reversible handoff.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history At this stage, preserve the evidence table, and ask the source custodian to record failure conditions before the reversible handoff.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition At this stage, preserve the failure note, and ask the production lead to record format readiness before the reversible handoff.
- 03
Test observable controls for headshot generator
A bounded evaluation should inspect input support, controllability, source fidelity, revision behavior, governance, collaboration, and handoff readiness. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. At this stage, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the delivery owner to record input provenance before the dated decision.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Third-party names, pricing, features, access, and specifications require current dated first-party verification. Use only authorized media, separate observed behavior from marketing language, and check current first-party documentation for any product-specific claim. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. During review, preserve the review copy, and ask the model evaluator to record evidence freshness before the controlled revision.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “headshot generator”, use a matched test asset, record the date and account context, separate observations from claims, and document tradeoffs. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. For this decision, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the source custodian to record input provenance before the source comparison.