- 01
Define the tool job and source contract
For Mood Board Generator, specify the material entering the workflow, the transformation expected within general video generation, and the deliverable leaving it. Keep generation, editing, publishing, and measurement as separate responsibilities. For this section 1, save a shot contract; have the art director review claim support; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a rights-cleared draft until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- Name required input rights and formats — record frame review, channel owner, camera intent, and workflow decision; keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- List controls that must be directly observable — record annotated source board, technical reviewer, editability, and workflow decision; keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- Define a reversible review handoff — record test worksheet, editor, delivery fit, and workflow decision; keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- 02
Compare against a stable acceptance frame
Use the same inputs, review dimensions, and stopping rules for every candidate. Record tradeoffs separately from availability so a promising test is not mistaken for verified product support. For this section 2, save a continuity sheet; have the fact checker review source rights; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a reversible handoff until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- 03
Run a bounded tool test
Use one representative asset and a fixed brief. Observe what the interface actually accepts, which controls affect the result, how revisions behave, and what must still be completed elsewhere. Record failures as carefully as successes. For this section 3, save a evidence ledger; have the technical reviewer review temporal stability; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a reversible handoff until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- 04
Select on workflow fit, not implied automation
Compare review effort, controllability, source fidelity, rights handling, and export readiness. A useful planning page does not upload media, invoke a model, or manufacture a result merely because the query contains the word tool. For this section 4, save a test worksheet; have the channel owner review motion coherence; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a reversible handoff until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- 05
Keep the evidence ledger attached to the decision
Partial evidence was supplied, but it does not establish product support or a complete capability, customer, or performance claim. Record the source, verification date, claim scope, unresolved gap, and the decision that the evidence can support. Search demand must never be reused as capability proof. For this section 5, save a annotated source board; have the prompt designer review reference integrity; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a reversible handoff until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- 06
Build a specific test brief for mood board generator
Start with a rights-cleared representative source and a written acceptance brief. Define one observable change, protected details, a stopping rule, and the named reviewer. The intended output is a reviewable visual-production brief and evidence-aware handoff. Test one variable per version, preserve the source and settings, and compare results at the actual delivery size instead of choosing from an unrecorded impression. For this topic test, save a test worksheet; have the editor review reference integrity; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a workflow decision until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- Primary query: mood board generator; test record: versioned handoff, art director, delivery fit, and approved master; keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- Editorial owner: keyword-expansion:0179; decision record: versioned handoff, editor, action readability, and reproducible test; keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- Source scope: a user-provided competitor-gap export dated 2026-08-05 supports topic prioritization only; source review: continuity sheet, media owner, identity consent, and reversible handoff; keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.
- 07
Separate topic fit from product proof
A dated, user-provided competitor-gap export supports only the decision to cover “mood board generator.” It does not prove audience demand, SEELE capability, third-party behavior, commercial value, or a likely outcome. Verify product-specific statements against current first-party documentation and a recorded representative test. For this source review, save a delivery checklist; have the art director review motion coherence; record the failed case as well as the accepted one; and do not advance it beyond a stakeholder sign-off until the named limitation is resolved. Keep generator evidence separate from mood assumptions.