- 01
Define the tool evaluation job
Treat “morph faces” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First clarify the requested job, observe current controls on a bounded test, and document workflow fit and evidence gaps. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. Before delivery, preserve the test fixture, and ask the claims reviewer to record source fidelity before the delivery pass.
- 02
Prepare inputs for motion effects
For this topic, assemble the authorized shot, desired motion cue, protected scene elements, timing, and compositing requirements. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. Before delivery, preserve the rights memo, and ask the policy reviewer to record disclosure clarity before the delivery pass.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse Before revision, preserve the source ledger, and ask the delivery owner to record format readiness before the production checkpoint.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history Before revision, preserve the brief version, and ask the continuity editor to record human approval before the production checkpoint.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition Before revision, preserve the review copy, and ask the source custodian to record source fidelity before the release review.
- 03
Test observable controls for morph faces
A bounded evaluation should inspect motion direction, intensity, camera relationship, masks, edge behavior, temporal coherence, and reversibility. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. Before revision, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the workflow owner to record camera logic before the release review.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Treat effect names as evaluation topics, not proof of a one-click SEELE feature or guaranteed artifact-free result. Use only authorized media, separate observed behavior from marketing language, and check current first-party documentation for any product-specific claim. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. Before moving on, preserve the failure note, and ask the source custodian to record source fidelity before the final sign-off.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “morph faces”, inspect transitions and edges across frames, compare against the original shot, and retain a clean fallback plate. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. For this checkpoint, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the continuity editor to record camera logic before the rights check.