- 01
Define the workflow learning job
Treat “photo progression” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First turn the query into a repeatable sequence with explicit inputs, review points, and a reversible handoff. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. For a reversible workflow, preserve the evidence table, and ask the continuity editor to record destination fit before the fallback decision.
- 02
Prepare inputs for visual creation tools
For this topic, assemble a clear creative job, authorized references, required controls, reviewer expectations, budget context, and delivery format. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. For a reversible workflow, preserve the review copy, and ask the continuity editor to record human approval before the acceptance review.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse Before delivery, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the creative lead to record human approval before the source comparison.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history Before delivery, preserve the reference set, and ask the policy reviewer to record reversal cost before the source comparison.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition Before delivery, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the rights reviewer to record evidence freshness before the source comparison.
- 03
Test observable controls for photo progression
A bounded evaluation should inspect input support, controllability, source fidelity, revision behavior, governance, collaboration, and handoff readiness. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. Before delivery, preserve the rights memo, and ask the policy reviewer to record input provenance before the source comparison.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Third-party names, pricing, features, access, and specifications require current dated first-party verification. Use only authorized media, separate observed behavior from marketing language, and check current first-party documentation for any product-specific claim. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. At this stage, preserve the rights memo, and ask the channel editor to record claim scope before the bounded test.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “photo progression”, use a matched test asset, record the date and account context, separate observations from claims, and document tradeoffs. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. While evidence is current, preserve the rights memo, and ask the model evaluator to record input provenance before the dated decision.