- 01
Define the workflow learning job
Treat “product avatar” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First turn the query into a repeatable sequence with explicit inputs, review points, and a reversible handoff. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. Before moving on, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the brand reviewer to record source fidelity before the scope confirmation.
- 02
Prepare inputs for avatar creation
For this topic, assemble an authorized identity brief, visual references, intended performance, disclosure plan, and delivery context. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. Before moving on, preserve the control log, and ask the workflow owner to record disclosure clarity before the fallback decision.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse At this stage, preserve the continuity note, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record visible continuity before the evidence refresh.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history At this stage, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the production lead to record claim scope before the evidence refresh.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition At this stage, preserve the reference set, and ask the model evaluator to record camera logic before the evidence refresh.
- 03
Test observable controls for product avatar
A bounded evaluation should inspect likeness boundaries, stylization, expression range, wardrobe continuity, and identity disclosure. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. At this stage, preserve the authorization record, and ask the source custodian to record source fidelity before the evidence refresh.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Never use a real person's likeness without permission or present a synthetic performance as an authentic endorsement. Any identifiable face, body, or voice requires explicit permission, a legitimate purpose, disclosure where required, and a human check against impersonation or deceptive endorsement. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. At the next gate, preserve the control log, and ask the factual editor to record source fidelity before the acceptance review.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “product avatar”, confirm identity consent, visual consistency, appropriate disclosure, and suitability for the intended audience. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. At handoff, preserve the control log, and ask the channel editor to record visible continuity before the reversible handoff.