- 01
Define the workflow learning job
Treat “relight photo” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First turn the query into a repeatable sequence with explicit inputs, review points, and a reversible handoff. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. For this checkpoint, preserve the reference set, and ask the creative lead to record format readiness before the workflow transfer.
- 02
Prepare inputs for quality enhancement
For this topic, assemble the best authorized source, a diagnosed defect, protected details, target display conditions, and an acceptance threshold. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. For this checkpoint, preserve the decision history, and ask the claims reviewer to record evidence freshness before the rights check.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse For this checkpoint, preserve the decision history, and ask the rights reviewer to record visible continuity before the dated decision.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history For this checkpoint, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the model evaluator to record input provenance before the dated decision.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition For this checkpoint, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the delivery owner to record camera logic before the dated decision.
- 03
Test observable controls for relight photo
A bounded evaluation should inspect detail recovery, noise handling, sharpness, color stability, temporal consistency, and preservation of intentional texture. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. For this checkpoint, preserve the review copy, and ask the production lead to record reversal cost before the reversible handoff.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Enhancement cannot restore facts absent from the source, and this page makes no resolution, speed, or quality guarantee. Use only authorized media, separate observed behavior from marketing language, and check current first-party documentation for any product-specific claim. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. For a controlled test, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the delivery owner to record camera logic before the workflow transfer.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “relight photo”, compare at native size, inspect faces and text, review motion when applicable, and reject invented or oversharpened detail. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. At the next gate, preserve the failure note, and ask the model evaluator to record failure conditions before the source comparison.