- 01
Define the workflow learning job
Treat “swap logo” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First turn the query into a repeatable sequence with explicit inputs, review points, and a reversible handoff. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. For this checkpoint, preserve the authorization record, and ask the source custodian to record failure conditions before the acceptance review.
- 02
Prepare inputs for visual creation tools
For this topic, assemble a clear creative job, authorized references, required controls, reviewer expectations, budget context, and delivery format. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. For this checkpoint, preserve the source ledger, and ask the rights reviewer to record evidence freshness before the workflow transfer.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse At handoff, preserve the rights memo, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record format readiness before the production checkpoint.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history At handoff, preserve the evidence table, and ask the rights reviewer to record reversal cost before the production checkpoint.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition At handoff, preserve the failure note, and ask the model evaluator to record source fidelity before the release review.
- 03
Test observable controls for swap logo
A bounded evaluation should inspect input support, controllability, source fidelity, revision behavior, governance, collaboration, and handoff readiness. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. At handoff, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the production lead to record camera logic before the release review.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Third-party names, pricing, features, access, and specifications require current dated first-party verification. Any identifiable face, body, or voice requires explicit permission, a legitimate purpose, disclosure where required, and a human check against impersonation or deceptive endorsement. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. In the decision log, preserve the review copy, and ask the identity reviewer to record human approval before the workflow transfer.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “swap logo”, use a matched test asset, record the date and account context, separate observations from claims, and document tradeoffs. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. At this stage, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the brand reviewer to record format readiness before the fallback decision.