- 01
Define the workflow learning job
Treat “the upscale project” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First turn the query into a repeatable sequence with explicit inputs, review points, and a reversible handoff. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. At this stage, preserve the evidence table, and ask the brand reviewer to record reversal cost before the bounded test.
- 02
Prepare inputs for quality enhancement
For this topic, assemble the best authorized source, a diagnosed defect, protected details, target display conditions, and an acceptance threshold. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. At this stage, preserve the review copy, and ask the brand reviewer to record input provenance before the bounded test.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse In the decision log, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the channel editor to record evidence freshness before the source comparison.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history In the decision log, preserve the reference set, and ask the release approver to record failure conditions before the source comparison.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition In the decision log, preserve the claim inventory, and ask the identity reviewer to record disclosure clarity before the source comparison.
- 03
Test observable controls for the upscale project
A bounded evaluation should inspect detail recovery, noise handling, sharpness, color stability, temporal consistency, and preservation of intentional texture. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. In the decision log, preserve the rights memo, and ask the release approver to record claim scope before the source comparison.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Enhancement cannot restore facts absent from the source, and this page makes no resolution, speed, or quality guarantee. Use only authorized media, separate observed behavior from marketing language, and check current first-party documentation for any product-specific claim. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. For a reversible workflow, preserve the rights memo, and ask the workflow owner to record human approval before the dated decision.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “the upscale project”, compare at native size, inspect faces and text, review motion when applicable, and reject invented or oversharpened detail. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. For the named reviewer, preserve the rights memo, and ask the claims reviewer to record claim scope before the dated decision.