- 01
Define the workflow learning job
Treat “upload skin” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First turn the query into a repeatable sequence with explicit inputs, review points, and a reversible handoff. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. At the next gate, preserve the input snapshot, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record destination fit before the fallback decision.
- 02
Prepare inputs for visual creation tools
For this topic, assemble a clear creative job, authorized references, required controls, reviewer expectations, budget context, and delivery format. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. At the next gate, preserve the continuity note, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record input provenance before the scope confirmation.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse For this checkpoint, preserve the reference set, and ask the delivery owner to record format readiness before the scope confirmation.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history For this checkpoint, preserve the delivery checklist, and ask the workflow owner to record evidence freshness before the scope confirmation.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition For this checkpoint, preserve the continuity note, and ask the factual editor to record control availability before the scope confirmation.
- 03
Test observable controls for upload skin
A bounded evaluation should inspect input support, controllability, source fidelity, revision behavior, governance, collaboration, and handoff readiness. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. For this checkpoint, preserve the evidence table, and ask the continuity editor to record visible continuity before the scope confirmation.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
Third-party names, pricing, features, access, and specifications require current dated first-party verification. Use only authorized media, separate observed behavior from marketing language, and check current first-party documentation for any product-specific claim. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. During review, preserve the brief version, and ask the source custodian to record claim scope before the reversible handoff.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “upload skin”, use a matched test asset, record the date and account context, separate observations from claims, and document tradeoffs. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. Before approval, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the channel editor to record input provenance before the dated decision.