- 01
Define the generation workflow job
Treat “video highlight maker” as a search job to investigate, not as proof that a SEELE feature exists. First write a shot or asset contract, test one controlled variation, and plan the human finishing work. Write the intended audience, source owner, desired change, protected details, reviewer, and delivery condition before selecting any interface or model. That brief keeps the evaluation specific and makes an unsupported assumption visible early. Before approval, preserve the review copy, and ask the claims reviewer to record revision intent before the final sign-off.
- 02
Prepare inputs for clips, shorts, and highlights
For this topic, assemble the authorized long-form source, target channel, required context, duration range, and caption needs. Record where each source came from, who may use it, and what must remain unchanged. Use a small representative asset for the first pass, keep the original untouched, and define a fallback route so experimentation cannot silently become the production master. For a controlled test, preserve the evidence table, and ask the claims reviewer to record source fidelity before the reversible handoff.
- Confirm ownership, consent, and allowed reuse For this checkpoint, preserve the test fixture, and ask the rights reviewer to record claim scope before the fallback decision.
- Preserve an untouched source and version history For this checkpoint, preserve the review copy, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record reversal cost before the acceptance review.
- Name the reviewer and acceptance condition For this checkpoint, preserve the brief version, and ask the production lead to record format readiness before the acceptance review.
- 03
Test observable controls for video highlight maker
A bounded evaluation should inspect moment selection, context preservation, reframing, pacing, captions, and the final call to action. Change one meaningful variable at a time and record the date, workspace, account context, input, setting, result, and failure. Topic selection can prioritize the question, but it does not establish availability, quality, speed, licensing, or a supported SEELE workflow. For this checkpoint, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the creative lead to record input provenance before the fallback decision.
- 04
Review evidence, safety, and policy boundaries
A compelling excerpt must not distort the speaker's meaning or imply automatic publishing or platform approval. Use only authorized media, separate observed behavior from marketing language, and check current first-party documentation for any product-specific claim. For third-party products, competitors, plans, models, and platform rules, attach a verification date and primary source; an absent statement is an evidence gap rather than proof of a limitation. During review, preserve the handoff draft, and ask the accessibility reviewer to record temporal order before the dated decision.
- 05
Approve a reversible production handoff
Before advancing “video highlight maker”, compare each excerpt with its source, check that edits preserve meaning, and validate current channel specifications. Document remaining manual work, unresolved evidence, destination requirements, and the person accepting the result. The handoff should preserve sources and test notes, allow correction, and avoid promises about output quality, turnaround, business performance, publishing, or access that the evidence does not support. At the next gate, preserve the evidence table, and ask the factual editor to record claim scope before the source comparison.